---
title: Raise Pinnacle and BetMGM market-type coverage
type: task
status: planned
description: >-
  Pinnacle resolves market_type on 5.8 percent of its markets and BetMGM on 12.9 percent, both
  against mappers that exist, so the gap is missing cases rather than a missing module.
base_uri: user:task/league/raise-pinnacle-and-betmgm-market-type-coverage.md
created_at: '2026-09-04T07:55:22.153Z'
entity_id: 087c10c4-5dd3-426b-ba3e-c9befbe6e3a8
observations:
  - ████████████████████████████████████████████████
  - ████████████████████████████████████████████████
owner_identity_uri: █████████████████████████
priority: Low
public_read: true
tags:
  - user:tag/league-xo-football.md
  - user:tag/software-task.md
updated_at: '2026-10-05T15:34:22.827Z'
visibility_analyzed_at: '2026-11-05T23:49:52.623Z'
---

## Background

Measured 2026-09-03: Pinnacle is 94.2 percent unmapped and BetMGM 87.1 percent. Both have mappers, so unlike BetRivers this is a matter of adding cases and, where the taxonomy genuinely lacks a shape, deciding whether to coin one.

Split by book before concluding anything here. DraftKings and Pinnacle sit at opposite ends of nearly every measurement in this domain, and Pinnacle additionally encodes a line into 476,767 of its market ids.

## Plan

- [ ] Bucket each book's unmapped markets by product name, as the DraftKings analysis did, and separate the modelable from the out-of-scope
- [ ] Map everything whose market type is already declared, coining nothing
- [ ] Rule explicitly on the remainder, and seed the ruled-out ids into a known-unmapped set per book
- [ ] Wire both collector arms and the importer signal for each book